Tuesday, September 30, 2008

The policies of "Chuck and Larry"?



Human Rights Campaign
 

A Senate Committee hearing is no place for a comedy routine.

Tell the Bush Administration's Howard Weizmann that equal family benefits are not a joke.

Take action now.

Dear Stephaun,

How would you expect top officials in the administration to prepare for a Senate hearing? By reviewing studies and data, or going to the movies?

If you picked the latter, apparently, you'd be right.

Last week at a Senate hearing on equal family benefits for LGBT federal workers, the Bush Administration's Howard Weizmann cited the plot of the Adam Sandler movie "I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry," about two men who pretend to be gay, as evidence the program would be scammed.

What next? Education policy drawn on the wisdom of "Ferris Bueller's Day Off"?

56% of Fortune 500 companies and 16 state governments already provide family benefits to LGBT employees, and there is zero evidence these workers are any more likely than heterosexuals to perpetrate fraud.

The American people deserve policies based on facts, fairness, and logic, not fictional scenarios designed to sell a ticket and get a laugh. Using a Hollywood comedy to justify opposing fair compensation is a new low even for this administration.

Weizmann went into the hearing with a neutral position on the equal compensation bill, which HRC has long championed. But when a colleague passed him a note he changed his tune.

The day after the hearing, Weizmann was still at it, telling the Washington Post his "Chuck and Larry" example "is not farfetched." Click here to remind him that lowbrow Hollywood comedies are meant to get a laugh, not drive policy decisions.

LGBT Americans demand no more for their families than the basic benefits and protections afforded to different-sex spouses. Let's remind Washington what's really at stake here—not box office receipts, but real American lives.

Warmly,
 
Joe Solmonese
Joe Solmonese
President

This link is specific to you, so please take action on this campaign before you forward to your friends. Having trouble clicking on the links above? Simply copy and paste this URL into your browser's address bar: http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/equalfam_weizmann

© 2008 The Human Rights Campaign. All rights reserved.
Human Rights Campaign |
www.hrc.org
1640 Rhode Island Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-3278
Phone: 202/628-4160 TTY: 202/216-1572 Fax: 202/347-5323
Do not reply to this email. This inbox is not monitored on a regular basis. Replies to this email will not be read or responded to.
If you would like to unsubscribe from a specific Human Rights Campaign list, or update your account settings, you can visit your Subscription Management Page. Click here to remove yourself from all Human Rights Campaign lists.

A Letter to John McCain

Letter to John McCain by Roger Ebert

I do not like you, John McCain. My feeling has nothing to do with issues. It has to do with common courtesy. During the debate, you refused to look Barack Obama in the eye. Indeed, you refused to look at him at all. Even when the two of you shook hands at the start, you used your eyes only to locate his hand, and then gazed past him as you shook it. Obama is my guy. If you are rude to him, you are rude to me. If you came to dinner at my house and refused to look at or speak with one of  my guests, that would be bad manners and I would be offended. Same thing if I went to your house. During the debate, you were America's guest. What was your problem? Do you hold this man in such contempt that you cannot bear to gaze upon him? Will you not even speak to him directly? Do you think he doesn't have the right to be running for President? Were you angry because after you said you wouldn't attend the debate, he said a President should be able to concern himself with two things at the same time? He was right. The proof is, you were there. Were you angry with him because he called your bluff? During the debate, Jim Lehrer repeatedly called upon both candidates to speak directly to each other. Obama looked at you. He addressed you as "John," which as a fellow senator is his privilege. His body language was open. You stared straight ahead, or at Lehrer, or into space. Your jaw was clinched. You had a tight little smile, or a grimace, or a little shake of your head. I had to do two things at once while watching the debate. I had to listen to what was being said. And I had to process your rigid and contemptuous behavior. If you were at a wedding and the father of the groom refused to look at or speak to the bride, how would that make you feel? Especially if you were the father of the bride? You made a TV commercial showing the moments Obama agreed with you. Everybody knows he did. Did his agreement show honesty, or weakness? It is significant that you said it proved he was not ready to lead. What is the better leadership quality: (1) Willingness to listen to your opponent, and keep an open mind? (2) Rigidly ignoring him? Which of the two of you better demonstrated the bipartisan spirit you say you represent? Was there anything he said that you agreed with? Could you have brought yourself to say so? I'm not the only one who noticed your odd, hostile behavior. Just about everybody did. I'm sure many of your supporters must have sensed the tension. Before the debate, pundits were wondering if you might explode in a display of your famous temper. I think we saw that happen, all right, but it was an implosion. I have instructed my wife to exclude you from any future dinner parties.

http://sos.georgia.gov/elections/voter_registration/voter_reg_app.htm

Perspective

Ok, as many of you know I have been on this kick all year about "perspective", and with all of the ancient wisdoms that are synthesized into to self-help products like The Secret (which I endorse by the way), and "What the Bleep?"; I can't help but wonder what perspective people are actually viewing themselves and their lives through?

I was chatting with a friend of mine about his life the other day, and he indicated to me that he feels like he is lacking in several areas of his life including the relationship department. Now this is something I can relate to, because there have been plenty of times in my life where I have sat back and wondered, "when are things going to change for me?". What I have learned about life, well one of the many things I have learned (lol), is that life is about perspective. The concept of lack, although it may have some physical attribution, to me is a psychological notion that involves the comparison of the reality of ones existence with where they perceive their existence should be.

I offered my friend a few words or rather two perspectives on this and wanted to share those on here also for anyone interested;

1. Where you are right now in your life is in direct correlation to where you wanted to be, and the decisions you made to get there years ago. The thoughts and decisions of yesterday, have great influence on what our tomorrow looks like....so as you move forward in your journey....know that today is only right now, tomorrow is forever....so you always have a chance to "fix" things....you just have to take advantage of today to do so...

2. if you always operate from a place of "without" or lack.....you will always be in that space....you are correct in thinking if you shift your thoughts about where you are in your life right now that it will manifest a different reality for you....i believe that you should also consider giving some thought and focus to what you do have instead of what you don't.....that way as blessings happen for you, your thoughts will be in the divine space to receive them and be thus attract more positivity your direction (The Secret)....

Someone sat me down and explained this to me years ago, and it has helped me tremendously.....hopefully it helps someone else.

Monday, September 29, 2008

Stocks Crushed

Approximately $1.2 trillion in market value is gone after the House rejects the $700 billion bank bailout plan.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/29/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm?cnn=yes

NEW BILL PASSES TO STOP THE SPREAD OF HIV/AIDS IN PRISON

PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release Contact: Michael Levin
September 25, 2008 (202) 225-2201

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE PASSES
CONGRESSWOMAN WATERS' BILL
TO STOP THE SPREAD OF HIV/AIDS IN PRISON

Washington, D.C. - Today, the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate passed H.R. 1943, The Stop AIDS in Prison Act, which was introduced by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) last year. This bill passed the House of Representatives by voice vote and was then referred to the Senate. On September 15, 2008, Congresswoman Waters and a bipartisan group of House members urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to consider the bill before Congress adjourns.

"I am proud that the Senate Judiciary Committee passed the Stop AIDS in Prison Act, and I urge the full Senate to pass this bill and send it to the President's desk before we adjourn," said Congresswoman Waters.

The Stop AIDS in Prison Act requires the federal Bureau of Prisons to test all federal prison inmates for HIV upon entering prison and again prior to release, unless the inmate opts out of taking the test. The bill also requires HIV/AIDS prevention education for all inmates and comprehensive treatment for those inmates who test positive.

"This bill is a bold step to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS in our nation's prisons and to prevent inmates from infecting other persons in the community following their release from prison," said Congresswoman Waters.

The Stop AIDS in Prison Act has been endorsed by AIDS Action, The AIDS Institute, the National Minority AIDS Council, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the HIV Medicine Association, AIDS Project Los Angeles, and Bienestar (a Latino community service and advocacy organization), as well as the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the Los Angeles Times.

"AIDS is spreading in our nation's jails and prisons. In 2005, the Department of Justice reported that the rate of confirmed AIDS cases in prisons was three times higher than in the general population. We need to take the threat of HIV/AIDS seriously and confront it in every institution of our society. That includes our nation's prison system," said the Congresswoman.

Congresswoman Waters is the Co-Chair of the AIDS Task Force of the Congressional Black Caucus. She has sponsored five initiatives in the 110th Congress to promote HIV/AIDS awareness, prevention, testing and treatment.

1. She introduced H.R. 822, the Routine HIV/AIDS Screening Coverage Act. This bill would require health insurance plans to cover routine HIV tests under the same terms and conditions as other routine health screenings and therefore encourage and enable more Americans to be tested for HIV/AIDS. This bill has over 40 cosponsors.

2. She is continuing her efforts to expand the Minority AIDS Initiative, which she established back in 1998 to expand HIV testing, treatment and prevention among racial and ethnic minorities. HIV/AIDS is more prevalent in minority communities. On March 19, 2008, she sent a letter to House appropriators requesting $610 million for the Minority AIDS Initiative in fiscal year 2009, and 79 Members of Congress signed her letter.

3. She introduced H.R. 1943, the Stop AIDS in Prison Act, which passed the House of Representatives on September 25, 2007, and passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 25, 2008. It now awaits consideration in the full Senate.

4. She introduced H.Con.Res. 426, a resolution to commemorate the 10th Anniversary of the establishment of the Minority AIDS Initiative. More than 50 Members of Congress cosponsored this resolution.

5. She introduced H.Res. 1359, a resolution to honor the first annual National Clinicians HIV/AIDS Testing and Awareness Day. A total of 29 Members of Congress cosponsored this resolution.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Second Sunday of Atlanta Transition

Greetings Brothers, Sisters and All:

 

I hope this email finds each and every one of you in the best of health and spirits.  I want to first salute Brother Khalid Kamau for having the vision more than one year ago to resurrect Second Sunday of Atlanta, an organization that had all but dissolved and faded.  I also want to salute Brothers Rafer, Jon, Claude, Keon, Stephaun, Jaleel and Anthony for their leadership and involvement with the rebuilding of such a needed and desired organization for Black Gay Men in Atlanta – Second Sunday.  We recognize Atlanta as being a true Black Gay Mecca and having organizations in place that provide a much needed component for us becomes even more crucial.

 

As we turn a page in the history of the organization, this email is a Call to Leadership.  Now is the time for Black Gay Men in Atlanta who are concerned about the future and direction of our Beloved Community to step forward and become involved with the CHANGE we seek.  As the Acting Chairman of our Board of Directors, I am asking responsible, committed and concerned Black Gay Men in Atlanta to step to the plate and be the change we seek.  We can sit on the sidelines and complain, we have to get in to the fold and make change.

 

We have to ask ourselves WHAT we are willing to do to make OUR community better; all of us are getting older and we need to ensure the next community of brothers have an organization in place that serves them.  I know there are challenges around the direction we are headed as a country and organization; however we'll end up ANYWHERE if we don't have a sound plan for what we want to become and do as an organization.  So, where are our Black Gay Men?  Where are those who constantly say we need more from our community and have the time, resources and talent to give more – BUT DON'T?  This email is in no way trying to beat up on the brothers, I love us too much for that.  It is to turn the mirror around and ask "what are WE willing to do?" 

 

There are THREE of us actively involved in serving on the Board of Directors, Anthony, Keon and myself – we need more brothers to be involved.  Each second Sunday of the month, we do the best we can to ensure that the 40 or so brothers that show up have a safe space to meet in, a quality topic and facilitator and fair time to network afterwards.  We know more brothers want to come, they just don't know we exist.  If you want more, we need you to be involved. 

 

It's as easy as 1,2,3 to get involved:  1. Email me (montee@hbc-inc.org) and let me know you want to be involved.  2.  Call me (404-454-5469) and let me know you want to be involved. 3.  Show up on the 2nd Sunday of October and let me know you want to be involved.  Please consider your place in history and what future generations of Black Gay Men are asking us to do.  Now is the time for CHANGE!!!  We are responsible for making sure tomorrow is better for those on the way.

 

-------------------------------------------

 

L. Montee Jamal Evans,

Acting Chair  --  Board of Directors

Second Sunday of Atlanta, Inc.

Atlanta, Georgia

C: 404-454-5469

 

Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal;

nothing on Earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.

--- Thomas Jefferson

 

Election Poll Rules- Please Read

In case the contents of this email happen to miss you, the point is: DON'T WEAR OR PASS OUT CANDIDATE INFORMATION, T-SHIRTS, BUTTONS, HATS, OR ANY RELATED ACTIVITIES WITHIN 150 FT. OF A VOTING PLACE IN GEORGIA (AN TYPICALLY OTHER PLACES AS WELL)!!!!! YOU WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS LAW, PLEASE CONTACT THE "SECRETARY OF STATES' OFFICE" IN YOUR STATE. THANKS!!

**************************************************************
2008 Voting Laws!
Posted by: Zandra Conway
Sun Sep 28,2008 9:24am (PDT)

There is an email that is circulating across the country about campaign materials and elections. Please check with your local county office about the details. In Georgia, the law states: "No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute any campaign literature, newspaper, booklet, pamphlet, card, sign, or any other written or printed matter of any kind, nor shall any person conduct any exit poll or public opinion poll with voters on any primary or election day: (1) Within 150 feet of the outer edge of any building within which a polling place is established; (2)Within any polling place; or (3) Within 25 feet of any voter standing in line to vote at any polling place."
[Source: Official Code of Georgia Annotated 21-2-414(a)]
 
For Georgians, check out this website for dates and times.  For the other states, contact your Sec. of State.

http://www.sos. georgia.gov/ elections/ 11_04_earlyvotin g.pdf

If you want to campaign for your candidate, here is the rule:

"No person may campaign; distribute literature of written or printed matter of any kind; wear campaign buttons, signs, pins, stickers, T-shirts, etc.; circulate petitions; or perform similar activities within 150 feet of the building in which a polling place is located."

 
Time is of the essence - this will be a historical moment - be a part of it!

____________ _________ _________ __
 Zandra R. Conway Senior Consultant Teacher |Information Technology Specialist |Community Organizer |Leader PR Specialist |Speaker |Home Stager 404.752.9850 - Home 770.656-1078 - Mobile "Look forward to More Details"

*************************************************************
Stephaun Clipper-Wallace
Community Activist-Health Educator-Empowerment Specialist

www.stephaunelite.com
www.myspace.com/christianelite
www.groups.yahoo.com/group/southeast_ballroom_scene

"There's always someone asking you to underline one piece of yourself -whether it's Black, woman, mother, dyke, teacher, etc. - because that's the piece that they need to key in to. They want to dismiss everything else." -Audre Lorde

Saturday, September 27, 2008

IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT THE NEXT 4+ YEARS OF OUR GOVERMENT TO LOOK LIKE?????????




I IMPLORE YOU ALL TO PUT ASIDE YOUR DIFFERENCES ABOUT RACE, CLASS, AND SOCIAL STATUS......JOHN MCCAIN IS NOT THE PERSON WHO SHOULD BE LEADING THIS NATION AS IT'S COMMANDER IN CHIEF; AND HE PICKED THE LEAST LIKELY PERSON TO HAVE THE CAPACITY TO STEP IN SHOULD HE RESIGN OR BE REMOVED.

THIS IS NOT THE TEAM THAT WILL RESTRUCTURE THIS COUNTRY IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE MAJORITY, THIS IS NOT THE PAIR THAT WILL TURN TO THE CEOS' AND SHAREHOLDERS OF THESE TOP FINANCIAL FIRMS AND LET THEM KNOW THAT A 700M BAILOUT IS NOT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

I AM VOTING FOR BARACK OBAMA, NOT BECAUSE OF HIS COLOR; BUT AS A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE......I HOPE YOU WOULD DO THE SAME.

THANKS.

Friday, September 26, 2008

Early Voting has Started in Georgia!!

141 Pryor Street, Suite 4064

Atlanta, GA 30303

(404) 612-7060

 

North Service Center

7741 Roswell Road, Room 209

Sandy Springs, GA 30350

(404) 613-7675

 

South Service Center

5600 Stonewall Tell Road | Room 105

College Park, GA 30349

(404) 612-3050

WaMu becomes biggest bank to fail in US history



Wednesday, September 24, 2008

A Conversation with Damon Humes (Overall Father Jay Blahnik)

http://www.gayagenda.com/2008/09/ga-exclusive-a-conversation-with-damon-l-humes/

GA Exclusive: Conversing with Damon L. Humes
September 17, 2008 by James Hipps

I recently had the honor and pleasure of interviewing Mr. Damon L. Humes. Mr. Humes received an Honorary Doctorate Degree on August 2nd for his efforts in creating a scholarship fund as well as his efforts in the GLBT community.

Humes is also the Executive Director of the Men of Color Health Awareness (MOCHA) Project and an HIV/AIDS activist. Humes is also known as Jay Blahnik, a leader of the Ballroom scene, which is a Black and Latino GLBT subculture that showcases talents in fashion and performance arts.

MOCHA is an organization for people of color, which under Humes' direction, attempts to take the issues of GLBT health outside of HIV & AIDS. Although he admits HIV& AIDS are a large concern for the GLBT community as a whole, Humes says, "There are so many issues outside of HIV and AIDS that affects the GLBT community (such as HPV and transgender health issues) that are not being addressed." One of his immediate goals for MOCHA is to bring those health issues to the forefront and promote awareness to all aspects of GLBT health and wellness. Other goals he has set for MOCHA are increasing awareness of comprehensive health, spirituality, nutrition, abuse and drug use, with the hopes of being able to minimalize these issues within the GLBT community. Hume's states, "I would like to provide a means to improve all aspects wellness for the entire (GLBT) community".

Living his life, mostly in and between upstate New York and Philly, the man that makes up Damon L. Humes is one of constant change. When I asked him exactly who Damon L. Humes is, he answered: "That man changes to me every day. The one thing that remains constant is his love of dance and performing arts. "Change is good, because that means I am continuing to learn and to grow as a person. When we stop changing, we are dying."

I was very curious as to what, if anything, shocks him. When I asked, his reply was not ordinary, but extraordinary in that he looks at things from such a large scale view. He said what still shocks him to this day is, "The things we as humans put stock in." He gave me an example by stating "We were at war when Janet Jackson showed her boob on public television during the Superbowl. Instead of talking about what really matters, people were so caught up in Janet's boob. That is what shocks me." He also added, "Domestic violence and fatalism shock me as well. That it's accepted by so many, I just don't quite understand."

When I asked Mr. Humes what "fires him up" the most, he replied, "Hate-crimes. Hate has many faces including emotional and spiritual neglect and abuse. There isn't any mathematical equation behind hate; it simply affects us all negatively. LGBT couples are still fearful. Seeing LGBT people has to become normal, just as seeing heterosexual couples is normal. Then hate crimes will become a thing of the past." He added, "There is no singular approach to this however, it has to come from both religious leaders and the government."

The previous part of our conversations sparked me to ask his thoughts on homophobia, and what we as the LGBT community could do to help put a stop to homophobia. He answered by stating, "I don't really believe homophobia exists. Phobias are clinical. I refer to this is heterosexism, not homophobia. We, as a community, cannot be afraid to step out and stand up. The only way we will see change is to be change."

As well all know, the GLBT community faces many issues, however, I asked Damon if he had the opportunity to fix just one of those issues, what might that be? He replied, "Allowing people to self-determine their success. We are not all the same, so how can the world define success the same for all of us? There is no one set way to succeed, and think about what failures do to people psychologically."

Going further on issues that affect the GLBT community, another problem Humes sees us face on a regular basis is stereotyping. "We just don't have those positive roll models that other groups have", Damon said. "One reason of course is discrimination", he explained. "Discrimination comes in many forms. The use of religion for discrimination has been prevalent throughout history. People have used religion for all issues, including oppression based on sexual identity and gender. Religion claims woman was created from man, therefore religion often views women as lesser beings. God is a he, Allah is a he, Jehovah is a he, and to many gay men are less than a man and more like a woman, which perpetuates oppression."

Finally, I asked Damon if he had any suggestions for those who are just now, or are contemplating coming out as GLBT, and he responded, "Find someone who will walk with you. Don't make that journey alone."

I would like to thank Mr. Humes for his graciousness and time. It was again both a pleasure and honor speaking with him. I would also like to mention the scholarship he has established is from his soul generosity. Please contact him at dhumes@mochaproject.org if you would like to make a donation.

For information on how you can help support the HOUSE OF BLAHNIK program, please send an email to info@houseofblahnik.org

Also visit: www.houseofblahnik.org

Same-Sex Attraction Disclosure to Health Care Providers Among New York City Men Who Have Sex with Men

UNITED STATES:   "Same-Sex Attraction Disclosure to Health Care Providers Among New York City Men Who Have Sex with Men"
Archives of Internal Medicine Vol. 168; No. 13: P. 1458-1464    (07.14.08):: Kyle T. Bernstein, PhD, ScM; Kai-Lih Liu, PhD; Elizabeth M. Begier, MD, MPH; Beryl Koblin, PhD; Adam Karpati, MD, MPH, Christopher Murrill, PhD, MPH

Though CDC recommends that men who have sex with men (MSM) undergo at least annual HIV screening, a large number of HIV infections among this population go undetected, explained researchers in the current study. They sought to examine the association between disclosing to their medical providers (e.g., physicians, nurses, physicians assistants) same-sex attraction and self-reported HIV testing among MSM in New York City.

The analysis included all men recruited from the New York City National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) project who reported at least one male sex partner in the previous year and self-reported as HIV-negative. The primary outcome of interest was a participant having told his medical provider that he is attracted to or has sex with other men. Sociodemographic and behavioral factors were examined in relation to disclosure of same-sex attraction.

Of the 452 MSM respondents, 175 (39 percent) did not disclose to their medical provider, with black (adjusted odds ratio, 0.28 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.14-0.53] and Hispanic (AOR, 0.46; 95 percent CI, 0.24-0.85) MSM less likely to have disclosed than their white counterparts. No MSM who identified themselves as bisexual had disclosed to their provider. Those who had ever been tested for HIV were more likely to have disclosed (AOR, 2.10; 95 percent CI, 1.01-4.38).

"These data suggest that risk-based HIV testing, which is contingent on health care providers being aware of their patients' risk, could miss these high-risk persons," the researchers concluded.

Insurers Will Pay for HIV Screening if Governor Signs Bill

CALIFORNIA:   "Insurers Will Pay for HIV Screening if Governor Signs Bill"
San Fernando Valley Business Journal   (09.15.08):: Nadra Kareem

Late last month, the California Legislature passed AB 1894, landmark legislation that would require health insurers in the state to cover routine HIV testing. If signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, it would become the first law of its kind in the nation.

AB 1894 was introduced by Assembly member Paul Krekorian and is sponsored by AIDS Healthcare Foundation. Approximately 40,000 Californians are unaware they are infected with HIV, the California Office of AIDS says. The bill's sponsors maintain that the lack of routine testing puts more people at risk for infection.

"Studies have shown that when individuals know their HIV status, those found to be positive take steps to decrease the risk of passing their HIV on to others," said Krekorian.

"This important bill creates an environment in which testing will become routine and more Californians will know their HIV status, get linked to care as needed, and have an overall better quality of life," said Krekorian. "AB 1894 is a straightforward solution to a growing public health dilemma. It helps pave the way to encourage widespread and routine HIV testing throughout California, something CDC first recommended nationwide nearly two years ago. It is prudent legislation that will save lives."

The question of who will pay for routine testing has hobbled efforts to institute CDC's recommendation. Bill backers say AB 1894's requirement that insurers pick up the tab removes that impediment.
 

GA: AIDS Survival Project to Close at Year's End

GEORGIA:   "AIDS Survival Project to Close at Year's End"
Southern Voice (Atlanta)     (09.19.08):: Laura Douglas-Brown

The member-based, peer-led information and support group AIDS Survival Project announced this week it will cease the majority of its services by year's end due to flagging financial support. After months of discussion, the board for Atlanta's second-oldest HIV organization on Aug. 14 voted unanimously to "close responsibly, knowing that the ability to financially sustain the agency for the long term is just not before us," said Melanie Sovine, ASP's executive director.

Unlike when ASP opened in 1987, today there are many community agencies that HIV-positive people can turn to, Sovine said. "And then we've also been successful against discrimination, folks can live their lives not having to gather for protection inside an agency," she said.

In fiscal years 2007 and 2008, ASP was denied over $200,000 in federal Ryan White support, as the local review committee questioned why its peer-based adherence program was not led by medical professionals. Private grant amounts remained flat for years, while personal giving declined in the lackluster economy, Sovine said.

ASP's full-time staff of four, down from 12 at its peak, will leave by year's end. The testing and referral program targeting African-American women and black men who have sex with men will operate until June 30, 2009, when its five-year CDC grant expires. The program tests over 100 people a month, though it was contracted for only 85, and its seropositivity rate is a "very high" 4-5 percent, Sovine said.

ASP covered almost 40 percent of the rent for the building it shares with Positive Impact and the AIDS Alliance for Faith & Healing, said Positive Impact Executive Director Paul Plate. Plate's agency is working to find a group to plug the rent gap and to see which ASP programs and funding sources it could pick up. ASP's "Thrive! Weekend" workshop to help people cope with a positive diagnosis is available online, and ASP has also helped AIDS Athens and the Northwest Georgia AIDS Alliance to launch programs.

HHSWatch: Homophobia, Criminalization, and the U.S. Travel Ban

1950's Jet Magazine Story- Homosexuality & the Black Community

Greed and Irresponsibility


Obama for America
Stephaun --

The era of greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street and in Washington has created a financial crisis as profound as any we have faced since the Great Depression.

Congress and the President are debating a bailout of our financial institutions with a price tag of $700 billion or more in taxpayer dollars. We cannot underestimate our responsibility in taking such an enormous step.

Whatever shape our recovery plan takes, it must be guided by core principles of fairness, balance, and responsibility to one another.

Please sign on to show your support for an economic recovery plan based on the following:

• No Golden Parachutes -- Taxpayer dollars should not be used to reward the irresponsible Wall Street executives who helmed this disaster.

• Main Street, Not Just Wall Street -- Any bailout plan must include a payback strategy for taxpayers who are footing the bill and aid to innocent homeowners who are facing foreclosure.

• Bipartisan Oversight -- The staggering amount of taxpayer money involved demands a bipartisan board to ensure accountability and oversight.

Show your support and encourage your friends and family to join you:

http://my.barackobama.com/ourplan

The failed economic policies and the same corrupt culture that led us into this mess will not help get us out of it. We need to get to work immediately on reforming the broken government -- and the broken politics -- that allowed this crisis to happen in the first place.

And we have to understand that a recovery package is just the beginning. We have a plan that will guarantee our long-term prosperity -- including tax cuts for 95 percent of families, an economic stimulus package that creates millions of new jobs and leads us towards energy independence, and health care that is affordable to every American.

It won't be easy. The kind of change we're looking for never is.

But if we work together and stand by these principles, we can get through this crisis and emerge a stronger nation.

Thank you,

Barack



 

Paid for by Obama for America



 

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

How White Privilege Helps McCain and Palin

I thought this was a very interesting piece. Of course as most of you know, those who read my blog and pay attention anyway, I am an avid supporter of the position Tim Wise (a white literary scholar/author/historian/etc) has on white privilege in this country, and how its lack of acknowledgement continues to disintergrate the very fabric of this country (well....maybe I am being a little dramatic right....since this country was created as a result of white privilege....lol).

*******************************************************************
What Privileges Do McCain and Palin Receive Because They're
White?
http://www.alternet.org/rights/ 98915

13 ways McCain and Palin have enjoyed preferential treatment in
the presidential race.

What Privileges Do McCain and Palin Receive Because They're White?

By Tim Wise, BuzzFlash
Posted on September 18, 2008, Printed on September 18, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/98915/

For those who still can't grasp the concept of white privilege, or who
are constantly looking for some easy-to-understand examples of it,
perhaps this list will help.

White privilege is when you can get pregnant at 17 like Bristol Palin
and everyone is quick to insist that your life and that of your family
is a personal matter, and that no one has a right to judge you or your
parents, because "every family has challenges," even as black and Latino
families with similar "challenges" are regularly typified as
irresponsible, pathological and arbiters of social decay.

White privilege is when you can call yourself a "fuckin' redneck," like
Bristol Palin's boyfriend does, and talk about how if anyone messes with
you, you'll "kick their fuckin' ass," and talk about how you like to
"shoot shit" for fun, and still be viewed as a responsible, all-American
boy (and a great son-in-law to be) rather than a thug.

White privilege is when you can attend four different colleges in six
years like Sarah Palin did (one of which you basically failed out of,
then returned to after making up some coursework at a community
college), and no one questions your intelligence or commitment to
achievement, whereas a person of color who did this would be viewed as
unfit for college and probably someone who only got in in the first
place because of affirmative action.

White privilege is when you can claim that being mayor of a town smaller
than most medium-size colleges, and then governor of a state with about
the same number of people as the lower fifth of the island of Manhattan,
makes you ready to potentially be president, and people don't all piss
on themselves with laughter, while being a black U.S. senator, two-term
state senator and constitutional law scholar means you're "untested."

White privilege is being able to say that you support the words "under
God" in the pledge of allegiance because "if it was good enough for the
founding fathers, it's good enough for me," and not be immediately
disqualified from holding office -- since, after all, the pledge was
written in the late 1800s and the "under God" part wasn't added until
the 1950s -- while believing that reading accused criminals and
terrorists their rights (because, ya know, the Constitution, which you
used to teach at a prestigious law school, requires it), is a dangerous
and silly idea only supported by mushy liberals.

White privilege is being able to be a gun enthusiast and not make people
immediately scared of you. White privilege is being able to have a
husband who was a member of an extremist political party that wants your
state to secede from the Union, and whose motto was "Alaska first," and
no one questions your patriotism or that of your family, while if you're
black and your spouse merely fails to come to a 9/11 memorial so she can
be home with her kids on the first day of school, people immediately
think she's being disrespectful.

White privilege is being able to make fun of community organizers and
the work they do -- like, among other things, fight for the right of
women to vote, or for civil rights, or the eight-hour workday, or an end
to child labor -- and people think you're being pithy and tough, but if
you merely question the experience of a small-town mayor and 18-month
governor with no foreign policy expertise beyond a class she took in
college -- you're somehow being mean, or even sexist.

White privilege is being able to convince white women who don't even
agree with you on any substantive issue to vote for you and your running
mate anyway, because all of a sudden your presence on the ticket has
inspired confidence in these same white women and made them give your
party a "second look."

White privilege is being able to fire people who didn't support your
political campaigns and not be accused of abusing your power or being a
typical politician who engages in favoritism, while being black and
merely knowing some folks from the old-line political machines in
Chicago means you must be corrupt.

White privilege is being able to attend churches over the years whose
pastors say that people who voted for John Kerry or merely criticize
George W. Bush are going to hell, and that the United States is an
explicitly Christian nation and the job of Christians is to bring
Christian theological principles into government, and who bring in
speakers who say the conflict in the Middle East is God's punishment on
Jews for rejecting Jesus, and everyone can still think you're just a
good churchgoing Christian, but if you're black and friends with a black
pastor who has noted (as have Colin Powell and the U.S. Department of
Defense) that terrorist attacks are often the result of U.S. foreign
policy and who talks about the history of racism and its effect on black
people, you're an extremist who probably hates America.

White privilege is not knowing what the Bush Doctrine is when asked by a
reporter, and then having people get angry at the reporter for asking
you such a "trick question," while being black and merely refusing to
give one-word answers to the queries of Bill O'Reilly means you're
dodging the question, or trying to seem overly intellectual and nuanced.

White privilege is being able to claim that your experience as a POW has
anything at all to do with your fitness for president, while being black
and experiencing racism is, as Sarah Palin has referred to it, a "light"
burden.

And finally, white privilege is the only thing that could possibly allow
someone to become president when he has voted with George W. Bush 90
percent of the time, even as unemployment is skyrocketing, people are
losing their homes, inflation is rising and the United States is
increasingly isolated from world opinion, just because white voters
aren't sure about that whole "change" thing. Ya know, it's just too
vague and ill-defined, unlike, say, four more years of the same, which
is very concrete and certain.

White privilege is, in short, the problem.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political
endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Tim Wise is the author of White Like Me
http://www.powells.com/partner/32513/biblio/9781933368993 (Soft
Skull, 2005, revised 2008) and of Speaking Treason Fluently
http://www.powells.com/partner/32513/biblio/9781593762070 , publishing
this month, also by Soft Skull.
 

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Alice Walker & The 2008 Election

ALICE WALKER- The Guardian, Saturday September 20, 2008

I remember seeing a picture of Fidel Castro in a parade with lots of
other Cubans. It was during the emergency years, the "special period"
when Cuba's relationship with the Soviet Union had collapsed and there
was little gas or oil or fertilizer; people were struggling to find
enough to eat. It was perhaps Cuba's nadir, as a small Caribbean island
nation considered a dangerous threat by its nearest neighbor, the
United States - which, during this period, tightened its embargo. Fidel,
tall, haggard, his clothes hanging more loosely than usual from his
gaunt frame, walked soberly along, surrounded by thousands of likewise
downhearted, fearful people: he, like them, waving a tiny red, white and
blue Cuban flag. This photograph made me weep; not only because I love
Fidel and the Cuban people, but also because I was envious.
However poor the Cubans might be, I realized, they cared about each
other and they had a leader who loved them. A leader who loved them.
Imagine. A leader not afraid to be out in the streets with them, a
leader not ashamed to show himself as troubled and humbled as they were.
A leader who would not leave them to wonder and worry alone, but would
stand with them, walk with them, celebrate with them - whatever the
parade might be.

This is what I want for our country, more than anything. I want a
leader who can love us. This is not what we usually say, or think of,
when we are trying to choose a leader. People like to talk about
"experience" and war and the economy, and making Americans look good
again. I care about all these things. But when the lights are out and
I'm left with just the stars in a super-dark sky, and I feel the new
intense chill that seems to be the underbreath of even the hottest day,
when I know that global warming may send our planet into a deep freeze
even before my remaining years run out, then I think about what it is
that truly matters to me. Not just as a human, but as an American.
I want a leader who can love us. And, truthfully, by our collective
behaviour, we have made it hard to demand this. We are as we are,
imperfect to the max, racist and sexist and greedy above all; still, I
feel we deserve leaders who love us. We will not survive more of what we
have had: leaders who love nothing, not even themselves. We know they
don't love themselves because if they did they would feel compassion for
us, so often lost, floundering, reeling from one bad thought, one horrid
act to another. Killing, under order, folks we don't know; abusing
children of whose existence we hadn't heard; maiming and murdering
animals that have done us no harm.

I would say that, in my lifetime, it was only the Kennedys, in national
leadership, who seemed even to know what compassion meant; certainly
John, and then Bobby, were unafraid to grow an informed and open heart.
(After he left the White House, President Carter blossomed into a
sheltering tree of peace, quite admirably.) I was a student at a
segregated college in Georgia when John Kennedy was assassinated. His
was a moral voice, a voice of someone who had suffered; someone who,
when looking at us in the south, so vulnerable, so poor, so outnumbered
by the violent racists surrounding us, could join his suffering with
ours. The rocking chair in which he sat reminded us that he was somehow
like us: feeling pain on a daily basis and living a full-tilt life in
spite of it. And Bobby Kennedy, whom a mentor of mine, Marian Wright
(later Edelman), brought to Mississippi years later. He had not believed
there were starving children in the United States. Wright took him to
visit the delta. Kneeling before these hungry children in the
Mississippi dirt and heat, he wept. We were so happy to have those
tears. Never before had we witnessed compassion in anyone sent out to
lead us.
The present administration and too many others before it have shown the
most clear and unapologetic hatred for the American people. A contempt
for our minds, our bodies and souls that is so breathtaking most
Americans have numbed themselves not to feel it. How can they do this or
that awful unthinkable thing, we ask ourselves and each other, knowing
no one in power will ever bother to answer us. I'm sure we, the American
people, are the butt of jokes by those in power. Our suffering not
making a dent in their pursuit of goals that almost always bring more
tragedy and degradation to our already fragile, disintegrating
republic.

Sometimes, reading a blog, which I do infrequently, I see that
generations of Americans have been willfully crippled, and can no longer
spell or write a sentence. The money for their education has gone to
blow off someone else's intelligent and beautiful head. Visiting a
hospital, I see sick and frightened people who have no clue whether they
will get the care they need or whether it will be 15 minutes of an
incompetent physician's opinion. If we were loved there would be a
doctor free of charge, on every block, with time to listen to us.
Visiting our schools, I see no one has seriously thought about teaching
Americans what to eat, just as no one at the national helm insists that
we take sex education seriously and begin to unencumber our planet of
the projected hordes (Earth's view) of coming generations She can no
longer tolerate.
Our taxes are collected without fail, with no input from us; sometimes,
because we lack jobs, paid with money we have to borrow. Our children
are sent places they never dreamed of visiting, to harm and make enemies
of people who, prior to their arrival, had thought well of them. Kind,
smart, freedom-loving Americans.

When we are offered a John McCain, who is too old for the job (and I
cherish old age and old men but not to lead the world when it is
ailing), or a George Bush, or a Sarah Palin, how unloved we are as
Americans becomes painfully plain. McCain talks of war with the
nostalgia and forgetfulness of the very elderly; Palin talks of forcing
the young to have offspring they neither want nor can sustain; both of
them feel at ease, apparently, with the game in which their candidacy
becomes more of a topic of discussion than whether the planet has a
future under their leadership.

Where does this leave us average Americans, who feel the chill of
global warming, the devastation of war, the terror of the food crisis,
the horror of advancing diseases? Hopefully with a sense of awakening:
that we have had few opportunities to be led by those who have the
capacity to care for us, to love us, and that we, in our lack of love
for ourselves, have, too often, not chosen them. Perhaps with the
certainty that though we are as we are and sorely imperfect, we still
deserve someone in leadership who "gets" us, and that this
self-defeating habit of accepting our leaders' contempt need not
continue. Maybe with the realization that we, the people, are truly the
leaders, and that we are the ones we have been waiting for.

I write on September 9, my father's birthday. A black farmer in
Georgia, he risked his life to vote in the 1930s for a "new deal". If he
had lived and not died in his early 60s of overwork, ill health and
heartbreak, he would be 100 years old in 2009. Voting in November of
2008 for a candidate with heart I will honor his faith.

* Alice Walker 2008

House Issues Formal Apology For Slavery

I know this was old, but I am doing some research into this and I thought I would post it here now.

http://cbs5.com/national/house.apology.slavery.2.783254.html

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Dr. Kevin Fenton Director of CDC's NCHHSTP Branch Blogs About Tuesday's Congressional Hearing

Dr. Kevin Fenton, Director of CDC's National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, blogs about Tuesday's Congressional Hearing titled, "The Domestic Epidemic is Worse than We Thought: A Wake-Up Call for HIV Prevention". CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding and Dr. Fenton were among those testifying.


Read the NCHHSTP Director's blog post and contribute to the conversation at: www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/blog

 

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

OP: Ten Reasons Why This Election Should Be About Issues and Not Personalities (Huffington Post)


http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20080915/cm_huffpost/126570_200809151504

 
Stephaun Clipper-Wallace
Community Activist-Health Educator-Empowerment Specialist

www.stephaunelite.com
www.myspace.com/christianelite
www.groups.yahoo.com/group/southeast_ballroom_scene

"There's always someone asking you to underline one piece of yourself -whether it's Black, woman, mother, dyke, teacher, etc. - because that's the piece that they need to key in to. They want to dismiss everything else." -Audre Lorde

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Finding the Peace Within

September 9, 2008
Finding Peace Within
A Full Embrace Excluding Nothing


Most people agree that a more peaceful world would be an ideal situation for all living creatures. However, we often seem stumped as to how to bring this ideal situation into being. If we are to have true peace in this world, each one of us must find it in ourselves first. If we don’t like ourselves, for example, we probably won’t like those around us. If we are in a constant state of inner conflict, then we will probably manifest conflict in the world. If we have fighting within our families, there can be no peace in the world. We must shine the light of inquiry on our internal struggles, because this is the only place we can really create change.

When we initiate the process of looking inside ourselves for the meaning of peace, we will begin to understand why it has always been so difficult to come by. This in itself will enable us to be compassionate toward the many people in the world who find themselves caught up in conflicts both personal and universal. We may have an experience of peace that we can call up in ourselves to remind us of what we want to create, but if we are human we will also feel the pull in the opposite direction—the desire to defend ourselves, to keep what we feel belongs to us, to protect our loved ones and our cherished ideals, and the anger we feel when threatened. This awareness is important because we cannot truly know peace until we understand the many tendencies and passions that threaten our ability to find it. Peace necessarily includes, even as it transcends, all of our primal energy, much of which has been expressed in ways that contradict peace.

Being at peace with ourselves is not about denying or rejecting any part of ourselves. On the contrary, in order to be at peace we must be willing and able to hold ourselves, in all our complexity, in a full embrace that excludes nothing. This is perhaps the most difficult part for many of us, because we want so much to disown the negative aspects of our humanity. Ironically, though, true peace begins with a willingness to take responsibility for our humanity so that we might ultimately transform it in the light of our love.

National LGBT Youth Group Comments on New HIV Numbers

"National LGBT Youth Group Comments on New HIV Numbers"
Windy City Times (08.20.08):: Amy Wooten

CDC's new HIV incidence estimates, which found the US epidemic is and has been worse than previously known, also showed that new HIV infections are highest among those age 29 and under. That means there is a need for an updated social marketing approach to grab the attention of youth, said the National Youth Advocacy Coalition (NYAC), which serves lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender young people.

Many of those working to fight HIV/AIDS remember the disease when it killed their friends, an era that youth did not experience. Other barriers include few young people working in public health and a lack of resources.

"We've seen time and time again that if we take any method, regardless of what it is, and put it in front of a target audience group and allow them to create the message, we're going to have a much more positive response than if we just try to presume what's going to work for them and make it on their behalf," said Greg Varnum, NYAC's acting executive director.

For example, NYAC used CDC funding to create a social marketing campaign, "You Know Different," targeting young gay men and other youth of color. The youth developed the slogans, posters, and other messages themselves. "I know it would have looked very, very different if we hadn't involved them," Varnum said.

By getting youth involved, social marketing campaigns will speak to today's youth in their own language. Youth do not want outdated graphics and brochures with photos that have a circa 1995 look, Varnum said. Bombarded with media, teens are savvy and it takes more to catch their eye. NYAC has used text messaging and integrated social networking sites into its efforts, including MySpace, Facebook, and YouTube.

"It's funny, because a lot of these youth end up doing the work for us by telling their friends on these sites about the campaign, how to get tested," Varnum said.

"HIV Effort Cut in Georgia"

"HIV Effort Cut in Georgia"
Atlanta Journal-Constitution (08.22.08):: Craig Schneider

On Thursday, CDC officials confirmed that Georgia is no longer among the states taking part in its state-of-the-art program to track HIV incidence. Georgia had been participating for the past three years, receiving more than $1 million to conduct the advanced testing, which can distinguish longstanding HIV infections from ones acquired within the previous five months.

The funding cut does not affect any other state HIV/AIDS testing or services. But advocates said that since the state has never been on the cutting edge of HIV surveillance, testing or prevention, the loss is significant. CDC increased the state's funding this year for basic HIV/AIDS reporting by 70 percent, to $726,257.

In 2007, Georgia had 32,740 HIV/AIDS cases, a 27 percent jump over the total in 2004. State officials said the CDC program revealed there were an estimated 2,100 newly acquired HIV infections in 2006. That cannot be put into perspective, however, since the state has no previous incidence data for any comparison, officials noted.

CDC has reduced the number of jurisdictions included in the HIV incidence program from 34 to 25 cities and states, said Irene Hall, CDC's chief of HIV incidence and case surveillance. The process for inclusion was competitive, but CDC officials declined to discuss reasons why Georgia did not make the cut.

"It's a setback," said Dr. Carlos del Rio, co-director for the Emory Center for AIDS Research. "In order to have effective prevention, we need to know who is getting infected today, not 10 years ago."

Jeff Cheek, the local director of federal Ryan White funding in the metro area, said the state needs to intensify testing and prevention efforts.

"NY Wants HIV/AIDS Patients to Move to HMOs"

"NY Wants HIV/AIDS Patients to Move to HMOs"
Associated Press (08.22.08):: Valerie Bauman

The director of New York's Medicaid program, Deborah Bachrach, is recommending that HIV-positive New York City residents who receive Medicaid benefits be switched from fee-for-service plans to managed care plans.

The state Department of Health has conducted studies that show that all patients, including HIV/AIDS patients, are more likely to thrive under managed care. Health department officials note that "special needs plans" for people with HIV/AIDS are available through health maintenance organizations.

According to a health department study, people with HIV enrolled in these types of plans reported fewer interruptions in their provider-patient relationships than did fee-for-service recipients. They also had fewer emergency room visits and incidents of pneumonia, and they were more apt to receive consistent antiretroviral therapy, the study found.

Results from a separate preliminary study found HIV/AIDS patients who are enrolled in regular Medicaid managed care plans in New York are screened for breast cancer and cholesterol at double the rates of those in a fee-for-service Medicaid program.

However, HIV/AIDS activists fear the switch will result in lower quality health care and could interrupt services for some. "This is being done simply to save the state money, and that's not a good argument for managed care," said Charles King, president and CEO of Housing Works.

Claudia Hutton, a health department spokesperson, disagreed. "This is not about saving money. This is about using the money we spend to purchase better quality coverage for Medicaid patients. We used to have 6,500 doctors in Medicaid managed care ready to serve the needs of HIV/AIDS patients. Now we have 13,000," she said. "Most Medicaid fee-for-service providers serving AIDS patients are joining managed care networks to continue the doctor-patient relationship."

The state Department of Health is expected to issue a final decision on the recommendation in the next few weeks.

Eight States Cut from System that Tracks Rate of HIV

"Eight States Cut from System that Tracks Rate of HIV"
New York Times (08.23.08):: Shaila Dewan

On Aug. 22, CDC announced that eight states and Puerto Rico will no longer receive federal funds for its advanced HIV monitoring system. The system, which distinguishes between new infections and older ones, produced CDC's recent estimate showing that annual HIV infections were about 40 percent higher than previously thought. The states affected are Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.

The change cuts the number of jurisdictions using the new system from 34 to 25. CDC's recent HIV incidence estimate was based on data not from all 34 but rather from 22 that met scientists' standards, said Terry Butler of CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention.

Money for the program is awarded on a competitive basis. Butler said the funding that supports the system had not been reduced; rather, the 25 remaining jurisdictions, whose systems are deemed most reliable and capable of helping CDC produce the best estimates, will receive more money.

The funding lost by the nine jurisdictions totals about $3 million, said Julie Scofield, executive director of the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors. The alliance has called for a $35 million boost in HIV surveillance funding. CDC's "ability to say that they're going to have ongoing reliable reports of incidence is somewhat questionable unless you have funding for that," she said.

Butler said future monitoring efforts will use data from all 25 funded jurisdictions.

Foreclosures Mean Crises for HIV-Positive Renters

"Foreclosures Mean Crises for HIV-Positive Renters"
New York Times (08.26.08):: April Dembosky

Foreclosure rates in New York City doubled from 2004 to 2007, according to a study by the Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy at New York University. In recent months, at least 50 HIV-positive renters have complained to New York City housing organizations about being forced out or threatened with eviction due to foreclosure. Since there is no centralized system for tracking such complaints, agencies cannot know the total number.

For people with HIV who have children, the most common housing option is a small building or home in a poor area, properties that tend to be susceptible to foreclosure. The city's HIV/AIDS Services Administration (HASA) provides around $940 in assistance for a one-bedroom apartment, not including gas and electricity, $1,069 for a two-bedroom and $1,348 for a three-bedroom - levels unchanged since 2003. Tenants must contribute 30 percent of their income, chiefly from federal benefits, though they cannot be left with less than $330 a month.

"HASA pays 20 percent less than Section 8," said Sean Barry, co-director of the New York City AIDS Housing Network, referring to the federal rent subsidy program. "If a landlord has multiple clients applying with Section 8 or HASA, they know they can play around with the regulations and get more money from Section 8."

One woman with HIV said she learned she was being evicted due to her landlord's foreclosure only when she saw the "for sale" sign on the building. The stress of looking for a new apartment landed her in the hospital, she said.

In March, the City Council amended the housing code, making it illegal for landlords to discriminate against potential tenants with benefits like HASA or Section 8. However, only buildings with six or more units are affected by the amendment, which carries no penalty for violators.

Dimensions of Sexual Orientation and HIV-Related Risk Among Adolescent Females

"Dimensions of Sexual Orientation and HIV-Related Risk Among Adolescent Females: Evidence from a Statewide Survey"
Am Journal of Public Health Vol. 98; No. 6: P. 1051-1058 (06..08):: Carol Goodenow, PhD; Laura A. Szalacha, EdD; Leah E. Robin, PhD; Kim Westheimer, MA

In order to identify factors that may place adolescent females at risk of HIV/AIDS, the researchers assessed the relationship of two dimensions of sexual orientation - sexual identity, and sex of partners - with self-reported behaviors and experiences.

Data were gathered on sexually experienced high school females from four waves of a population-based survey. Of the subjects, 3,666 identified as heterosexual; 184 as lesbian, gay or bisexual; and 113 as not sure. There were 3,714 participants who reported only male sex partners; 79 who reported only female partners; and 180 who reported male and female partners. Logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate associations between sexual identity and sex of partners with HIV risk behaviors.

"Self-defined sexual identity was often inconsistent with sex of sexual partners," the authors wrote. Reporting sexual identities other than heterosexual and having same-sex partners, either exclusively, or with male partners as well, were associated with high rates of several HIV risk behaviors. A significant association was noted between coerced sex and every risk outcome. Having received AIDS education in school predicted lower HIV risk on four of six indicators.

The researchers concluded, "Programs to prevent HIV infection among adolescent females should take into account the complexity of sexual orientation and should address the needs and behaviors of sexual-minority youths."

Condom Use and Hip Hop Culture

"Condom Use and Hip Hop Culture: The Case of Urban Young Men in New York City"
Am Journal of Public Health Vol. 98; No. 6: P. 1081-1085 (06..08):: Miguel A. Muñoz-Laboy, DrPH; Daniel H. Castellanos, MA, MPH; Chanel S. Haliburton, MPH; Ernesto Vasquez del Aguila, MA, MPhil; Hannah J. Weinstein, BA; Richard G. Parker, PhD

The researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of 95 African-American and Latino men (ages 15 to 25) as part of a four-year ethnographic study in New York City. The purpose of the current study was to explore how the men's perceptions and participation in hip hop culture - "urban social and artistic expressions, such as clothing style, break-dancing, graffiti, and rap music" - and contextual factors of hip hop may be associated with the men's condom use, condom-use self-efficacy, and sense of community.

The authors found that differences in participants' perceptions of and levels of affiliation with hip hop culture were not statistically associated with differences in their sense of community or condom-use self-efficacy. The strongest factor negatively associated with condom use was frequency of participation in the hip hop nightclub scene.

"Popular discourses on young men's health risks often blame youths' cultures such as the hip hop culture for increased risk practices but do not critically examine how risk emerges in urban young men's lives and what aspects of youths' culture can be protective," the authors concluded. "Further research needs to focus on contextual factors of risk such as the role of hip hop nightlife on increased HIV risk."

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Relocating for Change

Relocating for change: Stephaun Clipper and MPowerment at MOCHA
September 2nd, 2008
by SJordan

Stephaun Clipper, an Atlanta, Ga.-based activist, has relocated to Rochester to head up the MPowerment Project at the Men of Color Health Awareness (MOCHA) Project’s Rochester office.

Stephaun Clipper Wallace has an extensive background in community activism and mobilization, public health, and youth advocacy. He has completed well over 10 years of service to youth empowerment, community activism and organizational psychology. He started his journey to community work while in California, his native state, where he was employed as a U.S. Army Senior Paralegal Administrator, stationed in several bases, including an overseas tour in Germany.

Stephaun served as the Public Relations Officer to the California Student Associations’ Black Caucus during his initial years in college, and also served as the first Black student to have served as a member of the College’s Board of Trustees.

Currently, he serves on several boards of organizations, both locally and nationally. He has been a leader in the House/Ballroom community for more than six years and helped found the Legendary House of Elite. He also served as a member of the Metro Atlanta HIV Services Planning Council (Ryan White) and a member of the Human Rights Campaign Atlanta Diversity Committee.

Stephaun is a proud father-figure and mentor of 14 youth locally and nationally. He is currently completing a degree in Criminal Justice, and will begin a double Master’s program next year, specializing in Public Health and Public Administration.

In his current capacity with MOCHA, Inc., Stephaun will manage and coordinate an HIV Prevention Program utilizing the research from two very distinct behavioral based interventions: Many Men, Many Voices and MPowerment. Both of these interventions are aimed at reducing HIV infection rates, increasing health awareness and knowledge and providing support to the programs’ participants, young men of color who have sex with men, more commonly referred to as the gay, bisexual and transgender communities of color. Stephaun also provides technical and capacity building assistance to local and national organizations, in order to help move the public health agenda for communities of color forward.

The MPowerment Project’s drop-in center is for gay, bisexual, and transgender youth and young adults of color ages 13-29, and is open Tuesday through Friday from 1 p.m. until 9 p.m.

For more information, contact Stephaun Clipper or MOCHA, Inc. at (585) 420-1400 ext. 14, (585) 420-1409- fax, www.mochaproject.org
or sclipper@mochaproject.org.